From the PM Desk: Why Your Due Diligence Playbook Matters
“The only place that success comes
before work is in the dictionary.”
~ Vince Lombardi
Consider that building a successful portfolio is a lot like putting together a
winning football team. Whether you’re an investor or an NFL scout, it’s
important to do your homework (or due diligence) to select the right holdings
or players, not necessarily just the star performers. If done well, the
proverbial whole should be greater than the sum of its parts.
In this edition of Markets in a Minute, we take a high-level look at our due
diligence process, the football equivalent of all the work that takes place
before the season even begins. We focus on what to consider when building a
portfolio using exchange traded funds (ETFs), which today attract the majority of fund flows. Yet many of the
same considerations apply to mutual funds and individual securities. And since
it’s the start of football season, we’ve thrown in a few more football
analogies for good measure.
Quantitative Screening
In broad terms, quantitative screening
is what we do to identify promising funds by weeding out candidates that don’t
measure up on key metrics. We look at fund performance over the long term – to
distinguish skill from luck – but that’s just a starting point. We also
evaluate expense ratios, assets under management, whether funds have remained
true to their stated investment style, downside risk, and much
more.
In many regards, quantitative screening is a lot like the annual NFL Combine,
an invitation-only event during which scouts evaluate draft-eligible college
players based on their performance on mental and physical tests, including the
40-yard dash, bench press and vertical jump.
Scouts pay particular attention to how individual players perform on
position-specific skills, which only makes sense. After all, the qualities
needed for a great offensive lineman (size and strength, for instance) are
different than those needed for a top-notch quarterback (like leadership, speed
and passing accuracy).
The same logic applies to quantitative screening. Each fund has a specific role
to play in a diversified portfolio, so we look at different types of funds
through different lenses. The role of real estate or utilities funds, for
instance, is downside protection and income generation. So, we place more
importance on yields than, say, share-price appreciation.
Qualitative Screening
Just as Combine performance may not be
enough for a player to make it into the NFL, quantitative screening is only one
piece of the puzzle when evaluating ETFs. We also get to know the
asset-management firms in charge of the funds we’re considering through direct
interviews and other independent research. What are we looking for? Some
of the factors that matter most are organization history, management-team
experience, investment process and resource allocation. Firms with high
management turnover, insufficient assets or scant exposure to a given asset
class or sector don’t make the cut.
Portfolio Construction
Keep in mind that selecting the “best”
ETFs isn’t about cherry picking funds based on their individual performance
metrics and manager quality. Investors should also consider the bigger picture
– or how each fund fits into a broader portfolio strategy. Our playbook calls
for:
Building a cohesive investment puzzle: Select ETFs that align with
investment goals, risk tolerance and time horizon, ensuring that each portfolio
holding contributes to intended diversification and avoids concentration risk. Too much exposure to specific
companies, asset classes or market segments can amplify losses.
Balancing risk and return: Different ETFs can help balance
portfolio risk. For instance, mixing growth– and value-oriented funds, or stock and bond funds, can lower
portfolio volatility and enhance returns.
Ensuring strategic fit and alignment with investment objectives: Each
ETF should match specific investment objectives, such as income generation,
capital appreciation or hedging against inflation.
Run the plays against the practice squad: Regularly perform stress
tests and scenario analyses to assess how a portfolio is likely to respond to
changing market conditions, and continuously monitor and rebalance to stay aligned with original
asset-allocation strategy.
The End Zone
In many ways, building a successful portfolio is
easier than ever. The number of ETFs and mutual funds has skyrocketed in recent
years to roughly 10,400 (not counting multiple share classes). Investors
have many more tools to gain exposure to all corners of the markets, and
competition has driven down fund costs too.
At the same time, the proliferation of ETFs has added complexity to the
fund-selection process, making thoughtful due diligence very important. Over
the long term, a disciplined approach to fund selection should help investors
get to the end zone, whether that’s a comfortable retirement, paying for
college or another financial goal.
Invest wisely and live richly,
The PM Team
The
opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and may not
necessarily reflect those held by Kestra Advisor Services Holdings C, Inc., d/b/a
Kestra Holdings, and its subsidiaries, including, but not limited to, Kestra
Advisory Services, LLC, Kestra Investment Services, LLC, Bluespring Wealth
Partners, LLC, and Grove Point Financial, LLC. The material is for
informational purposes only. It represents an assessment of the market
environment at a specific point in time and is not intended to be a forecast of
future events, or a guarantee of future results. It is not guaranteed by any
entity for accuracy, does not purport to be complete and is not intended to be
used as a primary basis for investment decisions. It should also not be
construed as advice meeting the particular investment needs of any investor.
Neither the information presented nor any opinion expressed constitutes a
solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. This material was
created to provide accurate and reliable information on the subjects covered
but should not be regarded as a complete analysis of these subjects. It is not
intended to provide specific legal, tax or other professional advice. The
services of an appropriate professional should be sought regarding your
individual situation. Kestra Advisor Services Holdings C, Inc., d/b/a Kestra
Holdings, and its subsidiaries, including, but not limited to, Kestra Advisory
Services, LLC, Kestra Investment Services, LLC, Bluespring Wealth Partners,
LLC, and Grove Point Financial, LLC. Does not offer tax or legal advice.